Project Witness Microshort Stories · Student Handout

The Weissmandl Rescues


The deportation trains from Slovakia stopped for almost two years, while the Bratislava Working Group bribed, forged, and stalled. This is the 90-second portrait of Rabbi Weissmandl, its chief strategist. It is also the portrait of the family he could not save and did not abandon.

Grades 9–10
Step 1 of 4 · Before Viewing

Before we begin

Two things to hold before viewing. The rescue is documented. Gisi Fleischmann led the Bratislava Working Group, and Weissmandl was its chief strategist. Beginning in 1942 the group bribed an SS officer with tens of thousands of dollars and forged letters from a Swiss official who did not exist. Abraham Fuchs’s account records that invented name as “Ferdinand Roth.” For nearly two years, the deportation trains from Slovakia stopped. The cause is contested. Historians agree the trains stopped, but they disagree over whether the bribery is what stopped them. This lesson asks you to hold both facts at the same time. The outcome is documented. The cause is disputed.

Rabbi Michoel Ber Weissmandl, archival portrait.

Rabbi Michoel Ber Weissmandl (1903–1957), chief strategist of the Bratislava Working Group. Source: USHMM / YIVO.

Vocabulary

Bratislava Working Group
A secret Jewish–Christian rescue network in wartime Slovakia (Slovak: Pracovná skupina). Gisi Fleischmann led it; Weissmandl was its chief strategist.
Deportation
The forced removal of people from their homes, loaded onto trains bound for Nazi concentration and death camps.
Transit Camp
A holding camp where prisoners were gathered before being shipped onward to a death camp. Seréd’, in western Slovakia, is where Weissmandl was held after his arrest.
Slovak Ransom (local bribery)
The Working Group’s local effort in 1942–43: it bribed the SS adviser in Bratislava and forged official-looking letters. This coincided with a pause in deportations. The trains from Slovakia stopped for nearly two years. That the trains stopped is documented; whether the bribe is why is disputed.
Europa Plan
A separate, larger 1943 proposal to ransom the Jews of all Nazi-occupied Europe for a very large sum. Unlike the local Slovak bribery, the Europa Plan mostly failed. The negotiations collapsed and the broad rescue never came.
Forgery
The making of false documents to deceive. The group forged letters in the name of a Swiss official who did not exist, so that its scheme would look official. Abraham Fuchs’s account preserves that invented name as “Ferdinand Roth.”
Rescuer (“upstander”)
Someone who uses their own position or safety to protect a person in danger. Julius Natali, a Slovak Christian, hid Weissmandl until liberation. A note on the word: scholars caution that the “bystander vs. upstander” binary can flatten hard choices made under terror; many prefer rescuer or, for those honored by Yad Vashem, Righteous Among the Nations.

Anticipation

Before you watch

For almost two years, the Bratislava Working Group prevented Nazi deportation trains from leaving Slovakia. The group bribed an SS officer and forged letters from an official who did not exist. Here is the part historians argue about: we know the trains stopped, but we do not know for certain that the bribe is why. What does it mean to give credit for an outcome when the cause is disputed? Write two or three sentences with your prediction before you watch.

Heads-up before pressing play

The film is 90 seconds. It concerns the Holocaust and the murder of Weissmandl’s wife and five children, and the moral dilemma of negotiating with the SS. It does not depict violence on screen. The family is shown only through silhouette and absence, and Birkenau appears only as architecture: empty rails, a closing door, a distant gate, smoke.

A note for you: If any part of this is hard for you, that is a reasonable response. You can step away, and you can tell your teacher.

View the Microshort · 90 seconds

Watch in full without writing. Ideally twice: once for feeling, once for detail. The notes come after.

QR code linking to the Episode 6 video page on projectwitness.org

Scan with any phone camera, or paste the link into a browser.

Step 2 of 4 · After Viewing

Analyze

The interior of a cattle car, light coming through the wooden slats.

The interior of a cattle car, light through the slats. In the dark of a sealed car like this, Weissmandl sawed through the lock with a wire he had hidden in a loaf of bread. Archival reference.

Text-Dependent Analysis & Historical Sourcing

  1. The final narration describes bribery and forged letters as “putting a stop to deportations from Slovakia for two years.” What cause does this wording assert? Distinguish that film claim from the documented pause and the historical dispute over its cause. What additional evidence would help evaluate the claim?
  2. The Working Group used bribery, forgery, and delay rather than weapons. How does the film present resistance as intellect and nerve? Point to one image. You might choose the envelope of cash sliding toward an SS sleeve, the forged “Ferdinand Roth” letter, or the wire hidden in a loaf of bread.
  3. The final narration says: “He begged his wife and children to jump with him. Then he jumped. But no one else jumped.” What does this sequence establish, and what does it leave unstated? Explain why an interpretation about intention must be distinguished from the narrator’s actual words.
  4. Gisi Fleischmann led the Working Group; Weissmandl was its chief strategist. How does the film share the credit between them, and why does that matter?
  5. SS-Hauptsturmführer Dieter Wisliceny was responsible for tens of thousands of deportations. The film shows him only as a sleeve or a gloved hand. Never a face, never a partner. Why do you think the filmmakers made that choice?
  6. The film does not tell us how many people hid in the Bratislava bunker with Weissmandl, because the sources disagree. Why might careful filmmakers leave a disputed number out entirely?
Step 3 of 4 · Creative Response

Create

A loaf of Slovak country rye bread.

A loaf of Slovak country bread. Weissmandl hid an emery wire-saw inside a stale loaf, then used it to cut through the cattle-car lock. Archival reference.

Argumentative Paragraph · MEAL Format

The Working Group bribed SS-Hauptsturmführer Dieter Wisliceny to try to buy time. Wisliceny was directly responsible for tens of thousands of deportations. Write one well-developed argumentative paragraph (150–200 words) using the MEAL structure (Main claim, Evidence, Analysis, Link) that answers the following:

Prompt

Was it right to negotiate with, and pay, a mass murderer if doing so might save lives? Make a claim and support it with evidence from the film and historical context. Hold the discipline: the deportation trains stopped, but historians dispute whether the bribe is why.

Underline your main claim sentence. Circle your evidence.

MEAL Graphic Organizer · plan your paragraph

Draft a phrase in each cell before you write the full paragraph.

M · Main claim
My arguable answer to the prompt:
E · Evidence
Specific proof from the film / record:
A · Analysis
How that evidence supports my claim:
L · Link
Sentence tying back to the claim:

How your work will be looked at

Single-Point Rubric · Your MEAL Paragraph
Criteria Evidence of meeting the standard Area to grow
Main claimOne clear, arguable claim that answers the prompt about whether it was right to bribe the SS. A summary does not count. 
Evidence (specific)Uses specific evidence from the film and the record, such as the forged “Ferdinand Roth” letter, the bribe, or the documented two-year pause. 
AnalysisExplains how the evidence supports the claim, rather than leaving it to speak for itself. 
MEAL structureMoves Main → Evidence → Analysis → Link; the closing sentence ties back to the claim. 
Historical accuracyHolds the discipline: states the documented outcome without asserting the contested cause; names/spellings correct. 

This is a single-point rubric: the middle column is the target. Use the last column to note one concrete thing to strengthen. That note can come from your teacher, a partner, or yourself.

Step 4 of 4 · Closing

Reflect

⏱ 60-second recall · not graded

Quick check before you reflect

Cover the meanings and see if you can match each term from memory. Then check yourself:

  • Documented outcome · the deportation trains stopped for about two years
  • Contested cause · whether the bribery is why they stopped
  • Gisi Fleischmann · led the Working Group
  • Chief strategist · Weissmandl’s role in the group

Order the geography. Put these in the order they appear in Weissmandl’s story: Auschwitz · Nitra · Seréd’ · Bratislava · Mount Kisco (New York). (Check: Nitra → Bratislava → Seréd’ → Auschwitz; then escape and rebuilding → Mount Kisco.)

Sentence Frame Reflection

Complete the following sentence frame. You may write as many sentences as you need. The frame is a starting point, not a limit. Be specific.

“This story complicated my understanding of rescue because ___. I used to think a rescuer was someone who ___. Now I realize it can also mean ___. One question I am still sitting with is ___. It is all right not to have this fully figured out. ‘I’m not sure yet’ is an acceptable answer.”

Share your reflection with a partner. Where do your reflections overlap? Where do they diverge?

“He could not save them. The yeshiva still teaches.”
Project Witness, The Weissmandl Rescues (end card). The Nitra Yeshiva in Mount Kisco, New York, founded 1949, operates today.